Randoms

For those interested in Greek or who secretly wished they'd been part of a fraternity/sorority in college, DTS in Greek is "Delta Theta Sigma" or Δ Θ Σ. Maybe we can get matching sweatshirts.

Paraphrasing T.R. Glover, Christians of the early church out-lived, out-thought and out-died their pagan counterparts. How are we doing today, compared to the world?

I was reminded of a DTS tradition that I'd totally forgotten (thanks, Charla!)--that of welcoming theologians who have passed away recently into the league of other greats studied and honored by the Dead Theologians Society. As I mentioned in my other blog, Another Inkling, Dr. Robert Webber, a former professor of mine, passed away at the end of April. We will do something to toast him at next week's meeting of DTS.

Ch. 4: Transposition

In this chapter, Lewis creates and explores a concept he calls "transposition." This is not in the musical sense of changing music to a different key nor is it in the sense of flipping lettesr around when you type. It is a description of the interface, in a way, between the spiritual and physical realms. Or, put another way, the way higher things are explained/experienced through lower things.

Lewis begins with the example of speaking in tongues. This is a practice which he admits "has often been a stumbling block...an embarrassing phenomenon." He continues later, "We cannot as Christians shelve the story of Pentecost or deny that there, at any rate, the speaking of tongues was miraculous...It looks, therefore, as if we shall have to say that the very same phenomenon which is sometimes not only natural but even pathological is at other times (or at least at one other time) the organ of the Holy Ghost." I think of 1 Corinthians 1:27--"But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong."

Ultimately he leaves speaking in tongues alone and expands on the concept he's come up with. He talks of the difficulty of having to understand things through our physical senses and the disadvantage of having those things we can sense in the natural realm be more inviting to us than those things we'd like to hope for in the spiritual realm, simply because we can more easily understand them. He also talks about the impossibility of the unbeliever grasping most anything spiritual. Those who can grasp the higher can grasp both the higher and the lower things. Those looking "up from the bottom" can only grasp the lower things.

Much more to cover on this chapter, but this post is long overdue already. Others want to chime in?

Ch. 3: Why I am Not a Pacifist

It was great having two new people this past week. We're definitely having more fun than should be allowed!

This chapter, "Why I am Not a Pacifist," was actually a talk given by Lewis to a pacifist group in 1940. There was much speculation in our group as to how that came about. Did they not know his position? Did they invite him, looking for a fight? (Not in the literal sense, of course...maybe a Scrabble duel or something.) Regardless, he lays down a thorough foundation (some say too thorough) for how he's going to examine the pacifist position. He looks at it from the perspectives of facts/reason, intution and authority and ultimately finds no strong argument for accepting the pacifist position as the right one, particularly for a Christian believer.

In the interest of time, I'll forego the usual collection of quotes, though there are many. Whether you're a war-monger or a pacifist, I'd strongly encourage you to read this chapter. Most people have never critically considered their own position, and I think Lewis creates a good framework for this, whether you agree with his conclusions or not.

I will pass on couple of articles I found elsewhere responding to "Why I am Not a Pacifist," both supportive and critical of Lewis:

"Failure of the non-violent Gospel: tragically, C.S. Lewis and much of Christendom are pro-violence" from the Catholic New Times

The Problem of War: C.S. Lewis on Pacifism, War & the Christian Warrior from Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity

For the sake of full-disclosure, a couple people from this group joined me to go shooting the weekend prior to this discussion. No hateful epithets were heard nor were any bloodythirsty looks observed. I'm a peace-lover. Though it may seem paradoxical to some, I am not a pacifist precisely because I am a peace-lover. That said, all perspectives were and are welcome. We seek the truth ultimately and hopefully can hold our opinions loosely in that pursuit, prepared to surrender our own ideas for God's should we find the two to be at odds.

Ch. 2: Learning in War-Time

This was a sermon given in 1939, early in World War II. Though it initially deals with the debate over learning's importance during a time of war, it's really broader than that. Lewis looks at the "sacred vs. secular" debate, i.e whether one's life should be fully devoted to "religious" activities or not. Ultimately, he chooses a middle path, neither advocating for people to run off to monasteries nor encouraging them to compartmentalize their lives into sacred and secular realms. As 1st Corinthians 10:31 says, "Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God."

Some prime quotes from this chapter:

"The war creates no absolutely new situation; it simply aggravates the permanent human situation so that we can no longer ignore it. Human life has always been lived on the edge of a precipice...We are mistaken when we compare war with 'normal life.' Life has never been normal."

"[People] propound mathematical theorems in beleaguered cites, conduct metaphysical arguments in condemend cells, make jokes on scaffolds, discuss the last new poem while advancing to the walls of Quebec, and comb their hair at Thermopylae. This is not panache; it is our nature."

"[E]very duty is a religious duty, and our obligation to perform every duty is therefore absolute."

"A man may have to die for our country, but no man must, in any exclusive sense, live for his country. He who surrenders himself without reservation to the temporal claims of a nation, or a party, or a class is rendering to Caesar that which, of all things, most emphatically belongs to God: himself." This is a great quote, in my estimation, to rebut those who blur the line between faith in God and patriotism/nationalism.

"The work of a Beethoven and the work of a charwoman become spiritual on precisely the same condition, that of being offered to God, of being done humbly 'as to the Lord'."

"To be ignorant and simple now - not to be able to meet the enemies on their own ground - would be to throw down our weapons, and to betray our uneducated brethren who have, under God, no defence but us against the intellectual attacks of the heathen. Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy needs to be answered."

"[W]ar does do something to death. It forces us to remember it...War makes death real to us, and that would have been regarded as one of its blessings by most of the great Christians of the past."

"If we had foolish un-Christian hopes about human culture, they are now shattered. If we thought we were building up a heaven on earth, if we looked for something that would turn the present world from a place of pilgrimage into a permanent city satisfying the soul of man, we are disillusioned, and not a moment too soon."

There's almost too much to cover, so I'll leave it at that. Join us this week as we dive into another war-time topic, "Why I am Not a Pacifist." This should be a great discussion.